Senate Passes Child Nutrition Bill, Cuts Funding For Food Stamps

School_lunch

by Paula Crossfield

In a surprise move last week before heading out for five weeks of recess, the Senate passed the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act with unanimous consent, which means all 100 senators agreed to pass the bill without an individual vote. The bill allots an additional $4.5 billion dollars over ten years to fund federal child nutrition programs including school lunch.

First Lady Michelle Obama supported the bill as part of her Let’s Move campaign to fight childhood obesity, writing in an op-ed in The Washington Post last week,”This groundbreaking legislation will bring fundamental change to schools and improve the food options available to our children.”

Though providing less than the requested $10 billion suggested by Let’s Move, this marks the first major step towards an increase in funding on the child nutrition programs in 30 years. In a statement yesterday, the First Lady said, “While childhood obesity cannot be solved overnight, with everyone working together, there’s no question that it can be solved. And today’s vote moves us one step closer to reaching that goal.”

According to Jane Black at The Washington Post, the bill includes money for the establishment of school gardens and for sourcing local foods. In addition, the bill “would mandate that the Department of Agriculture develop nutrition standards for all foods sold in schools, not just what is served in the lunch line,” which could mean eliminating ‘competitive foods’ like soda and candy bars in vending machines and a la carte lines. This won’t be so easy for schools to swallow, as the money from these purchases is often used to fund sports and art programs.

The pressure to pass the bill is now on the House, which is officially on August recess, but will be reconvening next week to work on a jobs bill. However, according to Black, the chamber is not expected to take up the bill until after the August recess. In order for the new funding to become law, the House will need to pass its version of the bill, which currently allots nearly double the funding (and reconcile it with the Senate’s version), in time for President Obama to sign the bill into law before September 30th, when the original funding is set to expire.

The Senate has promised to pay for their version of the bill with monies from other programs at the USDA. On the chopping block, for example, are food stamp benefits, or SNAP. $12 billion in additional SNAP benefits were set to come online in 2013, and have been mentioned as a potential source of funding for a jobs bill, among others. Senate Agriculture Committee Chairwoman Blanche Lincoln (D-AR) claimed that since these funds were already being co-opted, they might as well be used to pay for child nutrition. “I think it’s appropriate if these tax dollars are going to be spent that they’re spent on healthy food for kids,” she said.

Advocates have for the most part thrown their support behind the bill, even though what it offers equals around 6 cents per school meal, which wouldn’t even cover the cost of an apple per child per day. However, the added absurdity of taking food from the mouths of hungry families to give to hungry kids has gotten some groups riled up. The Community Food Security Coalition, made up of around 300 organizations, argues that “programs should not be paid for by cutting food benefits for low-income and disadvantaged Americans, regardless of the merits of those programs. Congress should not be voting to increase hunger.”

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) agreed more or less with the sentiment in a statement released yesterday:

The legislation rids schools of junk food, issues proper alerts to schools when contaminations occur, guarantees all foster children access to school meals, connects farms to schools to supply them with fresh, local produce, and strengthens nutrition resources for children and young mothers. But if our children are ever going to truly succeed in the classroom and beyond, they need better access to healthy meals in the lunchroom, and this legislation falls short of that goal. Further, I’m disappointed that the bill is paid for in part with future funds from the critically important SNAP program. I will continue to fight for more common sense changes to the program and secure the investments we need to make sure every child can achieve their full potential.

Photo Credit: a la corey via Flickr

Posted in Food Politics

7 Comments

  1. Anonymous said...

    It seems so inadequate, like peeing in the ocean or a band-aid for a severed limb.

  2. Anonymous said...

    This is clearly a primary issue in our country; however, I am concerned with the emphasis on obesity. Obesity is only one of the indicators of poor nutrition. There are many, many poorly nourished children who happen to be thin. I fear that parents of these children will ignore the emphasis on healthy foods because "my child isn’t overweight." All children need healthier foods, not just the ones who are overweight!

  3. Anonymous said...

    Marcy, I am so glad you pointed that out. I would like to see the emphasis taken off obesity for both children and adults. It is merely a symptom of a bigger issue.

  4. Anonymous said...

    This definitely is not the first time funding for child nutrition programs has been increased in 30 years. Federal funding for school meals, for instance, increases virtually every year to adjust for the cost of living. In the coming year, for instance, funding for a fully-subsidized school lunch was already scheduled to increase four cents, from $2.68 to $2.72, nearly as much as this paltry boost from the U.S. Senate. In other words, what Congress is proposing to so much ballyhoo is barely anythibng more than what schools automatically receive under existing legislation, and still the average school loses 35 cents on every meal it serves.

  5. Anonymous said...

    Just one step of many needed…but I’mm encouraged, at least, that it’s a step in a forward direction.

  6. lx69 said...

    My 6 yr. old eats the chemical-laden garbage that the US calls "lunch" at her school’s cafeteria nearly every day (not by MY choice, however, but by her mother’s and her new step father). This is indeed encouraging news; after having followed Jaime Oliver’s struggle to introduce real food into schools, and after signing petition after petition to get this "food stuff" out of our schools, I am for the first time slightly encouraged.

  7. Louis Kime said...

    The first thing required by the food stamp office is an application. Most counties have an online application process. The electronic application allows the process to get started the moment the application is submitted. Paper applications will be accepted, but the process will take longer than an electronic application. Most food stamp offices have computers available for applicants filling out electronic applications. Workers will be available on hand to answer any questions about the application you may have. *”

    Our webpage
    <http://foodsupplementdigest.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>